
Criminal Harassment: The Reality of Stalking Under Section 264 of the Criminal Code
- Richie Massia

- Jun 13, 2024
- 3 min read

Criminal harassment, particularly stalking, is a serious offense under Section 264 of the Criminal Code. This section defines criminal harassment as engaging in conduct that causes someone to fear for their safety or the safety of someone they know. Such conduct includes repeated following, communicating, or engaging in threatening behavior. This article delves into the personal experience of being stalked and the challenges of proving such harassment, especially when the victim is in a vulnerable position.

Section 264 of the Criminal Code specifically addresses behaviors that constitute criminal harassment, commonly known as stalking. Stalking involves persistent and unwanted attention that instills fear in the victim. The law aims to protect individuals from repeated, unwanted behaviors that can lead to significant emotional distress and fear for personal safety.
Recently, I was informed by my brother that my ex-wife has been spreading false accusations, claiming that I have been stalking her. This claim is not only unfounded but also deeply ironic, as it is actually she and her boyfriend who have been stalking me. Last night, I managed to capture video evidence of their behavior, which clearly demonstrates their intent to harass me.
The incident occurred while I was walking down Cochrane Road. My ex-wife and her boyfriend, driving his Metro Towing Company pickup truck, made three deliberate passes near me:
1. First Encounter: They drove towards me as I walked down Cochrane Road.
2. Second Encounter: Less than two minutes later, they drove behind me.
3. Third Encounter: Approximately five minutes later, on a different street, they drove towards me again, where I managed to record them.
This behavior fits the legal definition of criminal harassment under Section 264, yet proving this to law enforcement remains challenging.
As a homeless father without a fixed address, my credibility is often questioned. The absence of a dramatic "scene" during these incidents further complicates the situation, making it difficult to convince the police of the harassment. Additionally, dealing with a narcissist like my ex-wife, who projects her own behavior onto others, exacerbates the issue.
Narcissists often blame others for their actions, creating a distorted reality where the victim appears to be the perpetrator. This form of psychological manipulation can leave the true victim feeling helpless and trapped. My ex-wife has even admitted to me personally that her goal is to see me dead, a statement that underscores the severity of the situation. Despite this, my primary concern is to ensure that my children know the truth about their mother and the lengths I have gone to protect myself and them.
Stalking and criminal harassment are offenses that can have devastating effects on victims. It is crucial for law enforcement and the legal system to take such claims seriously, regardless of the victim’s living situation. Documentation, such as the video evidence I recorded, plays a vital role in supporting victims' claims and ensuring that justice is served.
Criminal harassment under Section 264 of the Criminal Code is a significant concern, particularly for those who find themselves targeted by persistent and unwanted attention. My experience highlights the challenges of proving such harassment, especially when living in vulnerable circumstances. Raising awareness about the realities of narcissistic abuse and the importance of taking all claims of harassment seriously is essential in protecting victims and ensuring their safety.
If you or someone you know is experiencing similar behavior, it is important to document all incidents and seek support from local resources dedicated to addressing harassment and abuse. The legal system must recognize and support all victims, ensuring that justice is not dependent on one’s living situation or socio-economic status.
Richie Massia
A Father’s Truth Parental Rights Network
CEO / Advocate / Editor



Comments